This class is distinct from a geometric surface, which is two-dimensional. The idea of "uppermost" may be problematic. Further, the definition of layer (the superclass of surface in rev 133) references surface. This may be another issue.
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
label |
|
comment |
|
subClassOf | |
database_cross_reference |
|
definition |
|
has_obo_namespace |
|
obo:id |
|
is rdf:first of | |
is subClassOf of | |
is owl:annotatedSource of |