This class is distinct from a geometric surface, which is two-dimensional. The idea of "uppermost" may be problematic. Further, the definition of layer (the superclass of surface in rev 133) references surface. This may be another issue.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| label |
|
| comment |
|
| subClassOf | |
| database_cross_reference |
|
| definition |
|
| has_obo_namespace |
|
| obo:id |
|
| is rdf:first of | |
| is subClassOf of | |
| is owl:annotatedSource of |