| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| label
| |
| isDefinedBy
| |
| schema:datePublished
| |
| dct:title
| |
| dct:abstract
| - Two species were originally put in the genus Macromantis, and further a third was added; but these species were badly definite, more or less greatly confused and at last synonymized. However they are really distinct, and even a fourth is present, described here as a new one. This paper, based on about one hundred specimens, states the question and gives the distinctive characters and the known distribution of each of these species.
|
| bibo:abstract
| - Two species were originally put in the genus Macromantis, and further a third was added; but these species were badly definite, more or less greatly confused and at last synonymized. However they are really distinct, and even a fourth is present, described here as a new one. This paper, based on about one hundred specimens, states the question and gives the distinctive characters and the known distribution of each of these species.
|
| dct:issued
| |
| dct:bibliographicCitation
| - Roy, R. 2002. Révision du genre néotropical <em>Macromantis</em> Saussure, 1871 (Dictyoptera, Mantidae). <em>Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France</em>, 107(4): 403-418.
|
| is dct:source
of | |
| is stated in (Wikidata)
of | |