This HTML5 document contains 13 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n2http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n6http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
obohttp://www.geneontology.org/formats/oboInOwl#
n5http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ro/subsets#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:RO_0002163
rdf:type
owl:ObjectProperty
rdfs:subPropertyOf
n2:RO_0002323
rdfs:label
spatially disjoint from
foaf:page
https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/wiki/Part-disjointness-Design-Pattern
obo:inSubset
n5:ro-eco
n2:IAO_0000114
n2:IAO_0000125
n2:IAO_0000115
A is spatially_disjoint_from B if and only if they have no parts in common
n2:IAO_0000116
There are two ways to encode this as a shortcut relation. The other possibility to use an annotation assertion between two classes, and expand this to a disjointness axiom.
n2:IAO_0000117
Chris Mungall
n2:IAO_0000119
n6:22293552
n2:IAO_0000232
Note that it would be possible to use the relation to label the relationship between a near infinite number of structures - between the rings of saturn and my left earlobe. The intent is that this is used for parsiomoniously for disambiguation purposes - for example, between siblings in a jointly exhaustive pairwise disjointness hierarchy
n2:IAO_0000424
BFO_0000051 exactly 0 (BFO_0000050 some ?Y)
n2:RO_0001900
n2:RO_0001901