This HTML5 document contains 13 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dchttp://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n2http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:TaxonName
rdf:type
owl:Ontology
dct:modified
2015-07-01
rdfs:comment
Enumerated ranks of a taxon (scientific organism name) in a taxonomic hierarchy. This list is intended to be interoperable between name providers for bacteria, viruses, fungi, plants, and animals. It is not assumed that in each taxonomic group all ranks have to be used. The enumeration attempts to strike a balance between listing all possible rank terms, and remaining comprehensible. For example, the "infra-" ranks specifically mentioned in BioCode have been included (although very rarely used), but the additional intermediate zoological ranks (micro, nano, pico, etc.) are not included. Whether the selection of infraspecific ranks (some informal ranks, esp. from bacteriology, may be missing!) probably needs some discussion. However, it is believed that this list may help to start developing data sets that can easily be integrated across the barriers of Language and taxonomic traditions. Not included in the list are the botanical "notho-" ranks, which are used to designate hybrids (nothospecies, nothogenus). It is assumed they can be generated from separate information that the taxon is a hybrid. ICBN 4.4 states: "The subordinate ranks of nothotaxa are the same as the subordinate ranks of non-hybrid taxa, except that nothogenus is the highest rank permitted". The following publications have been consulted to determine the number of type terms that should be included and to prepare the semantic definitions: The Berlin Taxonomic Information Model, MoReTax view (Berendsohn & al., http://www.bgbm.org/scripts/ASP/BGBMModel/Catalogues.asp?Cat=MT DiversityTaxonomy model version 0.7 (G. Hagedorn & T. Grafenhan 2002, http://160.45.63.11/Workbench/Taxonomy/Model/InformationModels.html) ABCD version 1.44, types HigherTaxonRankType and RankAbbreviationType, by W. Berendsohn, reviewed by D. Hobern TaxCat2 - Database of Botanical Taxonomic Categories by Jorg Ochsmann, IPK Gatersleben; http://mansfeld.ipk-gatersleben.de/TaxCat2/default.htm A several ranks have been added to the original list to better accommodate names from ICNCP. (RDH). Many thanks for review and help go to Dr. Walter Gams. Version 0.3 removed subclass declarations to classes outside of this ontology in accordance with Recommendation 2.9 of the VoMaG Report http://www.gbif.org/resource/80862 This vocabulary closely follows the structure of the ScientificName complex type that is part of the TDWG standard Taxon Concept Schema. The TCS structure was based on the name structures suggested by the LinneanCore and those found in schemas such as ABCD. It reflects the contributions of many authors over a number of years.
owl:versionInfo
0.3
dc:title
TDWG Taxon Name LSID Ontology TDWG Taxon Rank LSID Ontology
dc:creator
Roger Hyam
dc:description
Ontology describing a controlled vocabulary for taxon ranks. Ontology describing the metadata returned for LSIDs that are used for Taxon Names.
dc:publisher
TDWG Biodiversity Information Standards
dct:issued
2006-11-15