This HTML5 document contains 17 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

PrefixNamespace IRI
n8http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n2http://taxref.mnhn.fr/lod/bib/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n5https://mbmg.pensoft.net/article/39646/download/pdf/
schemahttp://schema.org/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
taxrefhttp://taxref.mnhn.fr/lod/
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
Subject Item
n2:300641
rdf:type
schema:CreativeWork bibo:Document
rdfs:label
Vasselon <i>et al.</i> (2019)
rdfs:isDefinedBy
taxref:taxref-ld
schema:datePublished
2019-01-01
dct:title
Vasselon <i>et al.</i> (2019)
foaf:page
n5:354625
schema:identifier
_:vb70019027
dct:abstract
<jats:p>Ecological status assessment of watercourses is based on the calculation of quality indices using pollution sensitivity of targeted biological groups, including diatoms. The determination and quantification of diatom species is generally based on microscopic morphological identification, which requires expertise and is time-consuming and costly. In Europe, this morphological approach is legally imposed by standards and regulatory decrees by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Over the past decade, a DNA-based molecular biology approach has newly been developed to identify species based on genetic criteria rather than morphological ones (i.e. DNA metabarcoding). In combination with high throughput sequencing technologies, metabarcoding makes it possible both to identify all species present in an environmental sample and to process several hundred samples in parallel. This article presents the results of two recent studies carried out on the WFD networks of rivers of Mayotte (2013–2018) and metropolitan France (2016–2018). These studies aimed at testing the potential application of metabarcoding for biomonitoring in the context of the WFD. We discuss the various methodological developments and optimisations that have been made to make the taxonomic inventories of diatoms produced by metabarcoding more reliable, particularly in terms of species quantification. We present the results of the application of this DNA approach on more than 500 river sites, comparing them with those obtained using the standardised morphological method. Finally, we discuss the potential of metabarcoding for routine application, its limits of application and propose some recommendations for future implementation in WFD.</jats:p>
bibo:abstract
<jats:p>Ecological status assessment of watercourses is based on the calculation of quality indices using pollution sensitivity of targeted biological groups, including diatoms. The determination and quantification of diatom species is generally based on microscopic morphological identification, which requires expertise and is time-consuming and costly. In Europe, this morphological approach is legally imposed by standards and regulatory decrees by the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Over the past decade, a DNA-based molecular biology approach has newly been developed to identify species based on genetic criteria rather than morphological ones (i.e. DNA metabarcoding). In combination with high throughput sequencing technologies, metabarcoding makes it possible both to identify all species present in an environmental sample and to process several hundred samples in parallel. This article presents the results of two recent studies carried out on the WFD networks of rivers of Mayotte (2013–2018) and metropolitan France (2016–2018). These studies aimed at testing the potential application of metabarcoding for biomonitoring in the context of the WFD. We discuss the various methodological developments and optimisations that have been made to make the taxonomic inventories of diatoms produced by metabarcoding more reliable, particularly in terms of species quantification. We present the results of the application of this DNA approach on more than 500 river sites, comparing them with those obtained using the standardised morphological method. Finally, we discuss the potential of metabarcoding for routine application, its limits of application and propose some recommendations for future implementation in WFD.</jats:p>
dct:issued
2019-01-01
dct:bibliographicCitation
Vasselon, V., Rimet, F., Domaizon, I., Monnier, O., Reyjon, Y. &amp; Bouchez, A. 2019. Assessing pollution of aquatic environments with diatoms’ DNA metabarcoding: experience and developments from France water framework directive networks. <em>Metabarcoding and Metagenomics</em>, 3(e39646) : 101-115.
bibo:doi
10.3897/mbmg.3.39646
schema:sameAs
n5:354625
Subject Item
_:vb70019027
rdf:type
schema:PropertyValue
schema:propertyID
n8:P356
schema:value
10.3897/mbmg.3.39646